How poor was China under Mao

Though now somewhat outdated, United Nations Development Programme 1999 provides an excellent overview of trends in poverty, education, health, and women’s status since 1949. World Bank 1992 is one of the earliest comprehensive reviews, while World Bank 2001 focuses more closely on the effectiveness and efficiency of the government’s poverty reduction program. While lauding overall success in poverty reduction and improving living standards, Asian Development Bank 2004 flags the emergence of Urban Poverty since 1995 as a growing concern. Khan and Riskin 2001 provides an alternative assessment of trends in poverty reduction and living standards during the 1980s and 1990s. He, et al. 2001 is a compilation of forty-four influential papers written by some of China’s best researchers, and Yan and Wang 1992 examines the geographic concentration of rural poverty. Information Office of the State Council 2011 provides an up-to-date, comprehensive summary of the totality of China’s poverty reduction work. With the reduction of extreme poverty (that is, the number of those poor not able to meet the most basic food and clothing needs) to very low levels in recent years, China Development Research Foundation 2009 (cited under New Directions) calls for new methods in China’s approach to poverty reduction. Similarly, World Bank 2009 (cited under New Directions) finds that the poor are now more widely dispersed and calls for a variety of new poverty reduction measures to better target poor individuals and households.

  • Asian Development Bank. Poverty Profile of the People’s Republic of China. Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2004.

    E-mail Citation »

    This insightful analysis recognizes China’s success in reducing poverty and improving living standards, lauds the government’s growing emphasis on the participatory approach, and calls for greater attention to emerging urban poverty.

  • He Daofeng, Wang Ming, Wang Xiyu, et al., eds. Omnibus of Best Poverty Papers. 2 vols. Poverty Reduction Research Series in China. Beijing: China Economics Publishing House, 2001.

    E-mail Citation »

    This two-volume work provides translations of the best forty-four papers selected from more than five thousand Chinese papers on China’s poverty reduction experience during 1978–2000. The editorial board, led by He Daofeng, includes many of China’s most well-known rural researchers. The forty-four papers include assessments of the government’s poverty reduction program and nongovernmental organization (NGO) engagement in poverty reduction work.

  • Information Office of the State Council. New Progress in Development-Oriented Poverty Reduction Program for Rural China. Beijing: Information Office of the State Council, 2011.

    E-mail Citation »

    This State Council white paper reviews the progress of the totality of China’s poverty reduction work during 2001–2010. The comprehensive summary of support for rural development, poverty reduction, social services, infrastructure, applied agricultural research, voluntary resettlement, and collaboration with civil organizations and international organizations convincingly documents the government’s deep determination and vast efforts to overcome rural poverty in the new century.

  • Khan, Azizur, and Carl Riskin. Inequality and Poverty in China in the Age of Globalization. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.

    E-mail Citation »

    This review of inequality, poverty, health, education, and women’s status during the 1980s and 1990s bases much of its analysis on independent household surveys undertaken by the Chinese Academy of Sciences in 1988 and 1995. Concludes that the sharp increase in inequality during this period severely limited overall poverty reduction, and that urban poverty was much greater than the extremely low levels reported by the Chinese government and others.

  • United Nations Development Programme. The China Human Development Report. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.

    E-mail Citation »

    The United Nations Development Programme’s first national Human Development Report for China provides a comprehensive overview of education, health, women’s status, and poverty from 1949 to 1999. While lauding China’s tremendous progress on improving these most important components of human development, this well-balanced document also clearly identifies the remaining health, education, and poverty challenges for the poorest and most disadvantaged segments of the population.

  • World Bank. China: Strategies for Reducing Poverty in the 1990s. Washington, DC: World Bank, 1992.

    E-mail Citation »

    Undertaken in close collaboration with the Chinese government’s Leading Group for Poverty Reduction, the World Bank’s first comprehensive examination of poverty and living standards in China establishes estimates of urban and rural poverty; reconfirms the geographic concentration of poverty in resource-deficient upland areas of western China, and the deplorable educational and health status of the poor; and recommends a multisectoral approach for the worst-affected areas.

  • World Bank. China: Overcoming Rural Poverty. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2001.

    DOI: 10.1596/0-8213-4937-6E-mail Citation »

    The second major World Bank assessment of poverty in China, this document reconfirms the growing concentration of poverty in upland areas of the western provinces. Focused on the effectiveness and efficiency of China’s poverty reduction program, the study calls for increasing China’s official poverty line, targeting poor townships instead of poor counties, placing greater emphasis on participation, and several other reforms.

  • Yan Ruizhen, and Wang Yuan. Poverty and Development: A Study of China’s Poor Areas. Beijing: New World, 1992.

    E-mail Citation »

    The most prolific proponents of the view that China’s poverty is highly geographically concentrated in mountainous and hilly areas, Yan and Wang argue that China’s poverty problem is the problem of its least-developed mountainous areas. This comprehensive analysis considers the extent, causes, and key features of poverty in the mountainous and hilly areas, and proposes a number of solutions.